Thursday, September 27, 2012

Hereinafter the Passenger


As the news of my appointment circulates among family, friends, and my university community, I receive attention, congratulation, good wishes, and one question: Aren’t you excited? No, actually, not that I’m aware. I’ve never been a particularly excitable boy.  And after eight years of remote possibility and over two more of stated intention and increasing likelihood, going to Poland seems the most natural thing in the world. Next step. Not quite as predictable or periodic as the sun coming up, but certainly logical and consequent, maybe casually destined.

This week I’m reading the terms of my contract for carriage aboard cargo vessels, and the reading is much to be preferred to the small print of airline tickets and the user agreements of electronic devices and social networks. It reads of a previous century, maybe two. The passenger is “asked to kindly take note of the following important information” as to “the peculiarities of passage aboard a cargo vessel.” As mentioned in my previous blog entry, the passenger, hereinafter, “the passenger,” must be able-bodied and visibly so with a certificate from a doctor verifying fitness. In “cases of doubt” as to fitness even with a certificate, the passenger may be subject to “a medical examination by the Association of Seafarers.” Who would not want to be examined by the Association of Seafarers and pronounced fit for duty? Who would not want to be enrolled in their company, the men who go down to the sea in ships? Fitness, the contract advises us, is “a matter of principle.” Ancient idea.

Among other ancient ideas, we find obedience and good order: “all passengers shall be subject to the authority and rules of the captain and the officers of the vessel.” Consumers, customers are not a law unto themselves here, and in fact, on a cargo vessel, are pretty much afterthoughts; “the transportation of cargo essentially takes precedence over the interests of passengers.” We seem almost to be paying for the privilege of being considered potential flotsam and jetsam. Rather tonic, refreshing. In the event of any of the following, the carrier may discontinue the passage and disembark the passenger at the nearest port of the carrier’s convenience:

Force majeure, marine, port and river risks or risks related to other navigable waters, actions taken by public or government agencies, epidemics, collisions, shipwrecks, fire, errors in the navigation or control of this or any other vessel, confiscation or seizure of the vessel as part of a legal procedure, sudden or unexpected shortage of fuel, war, hostile actions, civil war, terrorism, piracy, riots, strike or industrial action or any other causes and circumstances outside the control and responsibility of the carrier.

(Talk about covering your aft.)

So, Josh, are you excited yet? Maybe a little.